Archive for September, 2005

Putnam: JONES AIN’T WORTH HALF A HUNDRED

Friday, September 30th, 2005

TSS Predictions

Save your $50. Give it to a hurricane disaster fund. Buy a new bowling T-shirt for your wife. Go to a saloon. (That’s two o’s.) Pay $50 to watch Roy Jones play tarpaper shack in a Cat 5 hurricane? You’ve got to be kidding me. The guy was boring when he could fight. Sorry, I meant when he could box. He never fought, not in any real sense of the word. That china chin of his was the best-kept secret in sports. He did not just avoid honest combat, he ran from it. He was the fastest and the most skilled, but on any given day, 1000 other guys in leather mittens and short pants ranked far ahead of him as the bravest. His last two fights ended with him on his back, looking up, wondering where his legs had gone. With cable television paying him millions to fight tomato cans, he took his show to Portland, Oregon and Biloxi, Mississippi and Mashantucket, Connecticut. He fought people like Lou Del Valie and Reggie Johnson and David Telesco. He won by scores of 118-109, 119-109 and 118-109; and 120-106, 120-106 and 120-106; and 120-108, 120-106 and 120-108. He gave new meaning to the phrase brilliantly boring. So, if you want to blow fifty bucks to see Jones’ chin go three-for-three, be my guest. Or, you can flip to the other big cable channel and watch James Toney take the measure of somnambulist Dominick Guinn, followed by Chris Byrd winning a six-day dance marathon over a dangerous but frustrated DaVarryl Williamson.

Pat Putnam

(Pat Putnam is a feature writer for The Sweet Science who covered boxing for Sports Illustrated for 27 years. He is also the first recipient of The Sweet Science Lifetime Achievement Award. To access Pat’s work, simply CLICK HERE)

Cassidy & Cassidy: ROY JONES-ANTONIO TARVER FIGHT ANALYSIS

Friday, September 30th, 2005

Boxing Channel
Cassidy & Cassidy

Saturday night’s rematch between Roy Jones Jr. and Antonio Tarver may be Jones’ last chance to salvage his sagging legacy. For Antonio Tarver, it’s his chance to prove he may have had his eyes closed, but his knockout of Roy Jones Jr. wasn’t a fluke. For once in his career, Jones Jr may not be the favorite going in – just take a look at the Writers’ Predictions on this website. Whether you think Roy Jones should have even taken this fight or not, it’s an intriguing matchup, one which clearly has some fans buzzing. Robert Cassidy Jr. of Newsday and The Sweet Science and his father, former light heavyweight contender “Irish” Bobby Cassidy, analyze the third fight in the Tarver-Jones trilogy on this exclusive edition of “Cassidy & Cassidy.”

To access the podcast, simply click the icon below. And please, allow it a moment or two to download.

Podcast

Knish: IT’S A NIGHT FOR THE LEFTIES

Thursday, September 29th, 2005

TSS Predictions

Antonio Tarver is the same age as Roy Jones but has been fighting for half the time Jones has and also has had half as many fights. At the age they are, that translates to more of an edge in being fresh for Tarver than it does to Jones having the nod in experience. Jones has been off for a year, hasn’t taken a tune-up fight, and has been stopped in his past two fights (by both Tarver and Glen Johnson). I think the move up to heavyweight has damaged Jones for good because he did it so late in his career; his body just isn’t what it was before the move up. Tarver hits hard enough and is technically a sound fighter, one good enough to beat Jones for a second time on this night. Not concerned about Tarver taking Jones lightly, no way, they don’t like each other … Byrd has slowed down a bit of late and has been taking, and giving, more punches than in the past. While it makes for a more exciting fight, it isn’t necessarily a good thing. Williamson can crack some but I still don’t see him hitting Byrd clean enough to win the fight. His only chance is a knockout – and like Samuel Peter last weekend, it likely won’t come. A Byrd win would set up a major payday in a huge rematch against Wladimir Klitschkko– provided the networks allow it to happen – and sometimes what is best for boxing is what eventually transpires. Byrd by decision.

Joey Knish

(Joey Knish is a feature writer for The Sweet Science. To access his material, simply CLICK HERE)

Levin: WE COULD BE SEEING THE MIGHTY GUINN

Wednesday, September 28th, 2005

TSS Predictions

James Toney is one of my all-time favorite fighters, and capable of beating any hulking heavyweight out there when he’s in good shape. even when he’s not in shape, he can break ‘em down with the best body attack in the division, and is willing to fight through excruciating pain to get the job done. His utter calm in the ring makes up for that spare tire he’s been sporting. So I say with some reservation that Dominick Guinn will pull the upset this Saturday. Guinn looks fantastic. I’ve never seen him so sharp, streamlined and focused. I was impressed with the sparring I caught on video. And when trainer Joe Goossen has a willing pupil, he can work wonders. In this case, Goossen has helped a plummeting Guinn recover his confidence by getting him in superb shape and giving him purposeful sparring. The tools are there; it’s just a matter of keeping his hands busy. He takes a good punch, and throws tight, short, paralyzing combos. When his head’s screwed on straight, which I think it finally is, he’s a bad man. I think he’s going to outwork Toney and take the decision. Toney’s less than Spartan lifestyle and alleged steroid use (was it just to recover from surgery or has he been running with the wrong crowd at Gold’s?) is catching up with him. The injury to his achilles before his fight with Jameel McCline, the torn bicep against Rydell Booker, the blown out shoulder against Ruiz – these breakdowns are for a reason and portend more of the same. Wish he didn’t have to tempt fate this way, and got the conditioning to match his wondrous skills … Chris Byrd is too skilled a boxer to go the distance with Williamson and not get the decision. But the ungainly “Touch of Sleep” brings that puncher’s chance. His style notwithstanding, Byrd has proven to be of the grittiest boxers around. He’ll be prepared for Sleep’s dangerous right hand and won’t get caught clean. Byrd by decision … What does Roy Jones have left? My mind says nothing, my heart says something – at least enough to defy the odds one last time and (somewhat) restore his tarnished legacy. Jones hunts and pecks his way to a split decision victory.

Zachary Levin

(New Yorker Zachary Levin is a feature writer for The Sweet Science. To access his work, simply CLICK HERE)

Grant: TARVER’S GOT ROY’S NUMBER

Wednesday, September 28th, 2005

TSS Predictions

The late great Archie Moore referred to opponents that he just couldn’t figure out as a “cousin.” A cousin is someone who has your number despite the fact that he may or may not prove as convincing against mutual opponents. For Moore, that man was Ezzard Charles. Despite meeting him on numerous occasions in the ring, Moore could never get past Charles – even though he would later achieve greatness and hold the light-heavyweight title for 10 years. Antonio Tarver has seemingly mastered the puzzle of Roy Jones. In their first meeting Jones never figured out Tarver and I think deep down he knows he lost the match. Of course there was no doubt in the rematch. Add to that, although he and Jones are the same age, there is little doubt that they are at very different places on their individual career paths. Jones may indeed be a spent fighter while Tarver may have a few big fights left in his tank. Of course the great thing about top fighters who are willing to put it all on the line is that we don’t have to endlessly speculate. Anticipate Jones to start fast and try to gain respect. He’ll want to prove he has truly committed himself to the task at hand and prove that it’s all been just a big set of flukes that led to his recent knockout losses. Tarver will once again take his deliberate southpaw approach and befuddle Jones. Roy Jones has proven his greatness over an extended period but he has met the one man that he just can’t figure out. Tarver by KO in 10.

JE Grant

(JE Grant is a feature writer for The Sweet Science. To access his work, simply CLICK HERE)

PAVLOVIAN RESPONSE TO BOXING DEATH

Monday, September 26th, 2005

Robert Ecksel

There are some things you can count on. No sooner had the tragic passing of Leavander Johnson been announced to the public than the medical professionals started chiming in about abolishing boxing.

The first medicos out of gate were the men in white coats from New Zealand, whose Medical Association is demanding that boxing be banned. Dr. Peter Foley, the GP Council chairman, claims “boxing is a form of interpersonal violence unacceptable in modern society.� He says “we condemn other sorts of violence, so it is high time boxing was condemned as well.�

It seems old Doc Foley may have confused the Hippocratic Oath with the Hypocrite’s Oath, and he’s not the first nor last of his kind, but he should turn his attention to healing the sick, and leave the resurrecting to us.

People have been calling for the abolition of boxing for as long as there was boxing to abolish. In the old days the crusade was fueled by the prudes, the bluenoses, the teetotalers, the burn-in hell-repent-you-sinners bible-thumpers. Throw in an opportunistic politician or three, get some compromised newspaperman to beat the drum loudly in the media, and what should be a non-issue – two men fighting – gets lumped with prostitution, drug addiction, white slavery, you name it … while the bull spews from the bully pulpit.

Nowadays, whenever there’s a fatality in the ring, the doctors are the first to step up to the plate. We in the boxing community grant them all due respect – they do, after all, have scalpels – and let them have their say, no matter how disagreeable, no matter how off the wall. There’s no disputing that, from a medical standpoint in boxing, things have never been better, but the meat wagon is still in use (it’s just harder to see, hidden as it is behind an ambulance).

According to The Spokesman-Review of Spokane, Washington, nearly 900 boxers have died since 1920 as a result of injuries in the ring.

“It is time to ban boxing,â€? the editorial said, “a sport in which death is the predictable outcome of athletic proficiency … even among prizefighters who walk away, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons estimates 15-40 percent of ex-boxers have some form of chronic brain injury and most professional fighters – whether they have apparent symptoms or not – have some degree of brain damage.”

Every punch causes brain damage, but so does watching too much TV.

When the writer Carlo Rotella was asked about the abolition of boxing, he said, “Nobody becomes a boxer by accident. You have to significantly depart from the path of least resistance to even find the fight world, and it’s very hard for men and women who try boxing to stick with it. Fighters aren’t pushed into boxing; they’re drawn to it, and usually for reasons other than money.

“If your main motivation is to prevent the harm done to the bodies and futures of fighters, then you can save more bodies and futures by abolishing scholastic football, or fast-food franchises, or fashion advertising. If you’re really worried about brain damage, abolish action movies: you’ll save many more minds in the long run.â€?

Not everyone agrees. Take, for example, Dr. George D. Lundberg. He ignited the debate about banning boxing in 1983 when, as editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), he railed against boxing and called it an “obscenity” that “should not be sanctioned by any civilized society.”

And not a word about universal health care? Say, what’s up, Doc?

Lundberg predicted in a 1986 JAMA editorial that by the year 2000 boxing would be banned.

Wrong again.

When reason fails to persuade those who love with their opinions more than they love hard facts, maybe some numbers will help them see the light.

Boxing: 10 deaths a year
College Football: 11 deaths a year
Hang Gliding: 169 deaths a year
Horse Racing: 23 deaths a year
Motorcycle Racing: 77 deaths a year
Mountaineering: 308 deaths a year
Scuba Diving: 1100 deaths a year
Skydiving: 370 deaths a year

We can’t help but conclude that scuba diving is bad for your health; but instead of abolishing scuba diving – or boxing, for that matter – let’s open our hearts, let’s join hands, let’s put our heads together, and abolish the abolitionists.

Robert Ecksel

(Robert Ecksel is editor of The Sweet Science. To access the rest of his writing, CLICK HERE)

TIM GRAHAM ON KLITSCHKO-PETER AND THE STATE OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION

Saturday, September 24th, 2005

Boxing Channel
Tim Graham

What does tonight’s Wladimir Klitschko–Samuel Peter fight really mean for the future of the heavyweight division? Tim Graham, columnist for The Sweet Science and the Buffalo News, talks to Boxing Channel’s Charles Jay about why the division has deteriorated and what it might take to resurrect it. He’s rooting for one guy in particular on Saturday night and he’ll explain why.

To access the podcast, simply click on the icon below. And please, allow it a moment or two to download.

Podcast

The Russ Anber Show: PICKING APART THE HEAVYWEIGHT RUMBLE BETWEEN WLAD AND PETER

Friday, September 23rd, 2005

Boxing Channel
The Russ Anber Show

How would Russ Anber advise Wladimir Klitschko to approach his upcoming fight with Samuel Peter? Would he tell Peter to jump on his opponent with aggression from the opening bell, or to pace himself, mindful that he may have to go twelve hard rounds for the first time in his life? And what is the true significance of this showdown on the world heavyweight scene? Russ covers these subjects and more with Boxing Channel’s Charles Jay on this latest edition of “The Russ Anber Show.”

Russ Anber is Canada’s man-about-boxing, having worked as a trainer with pros and amateurs for the last 25 years. Among those he has guided – Otis Grant, former WBO middleweight champion. He also has his own weekly show, “In This Corner with Russ Anber,” which airs on The Sports Network (TSN), Canada’s sports leader (tsn.ca), and operates Rival Boxing, a manufacturer and distributor of boxing equipment.

To access “The Russ Anber Show,” click the “podcast” icon below, and please give the program a minute or two to download to your computer.

Podcast

Payne: I’M BULLISH ON KLITSCHKO

Thursday, September 22nd, 2005

TSS Predictions

I love Klitschko in this fight. People forget how well Klitschko can box, how fluid he can be, how much range and variety he has and how much more athletic than his older brother he can be. Though I seem to disagree with Emanuel Steward instinctively, I have to agree with him on this one. Peter is based on ten months of hype amongst fans and writers desperate to unearth a Tyson-like savior for a derelict division. But the gulf between Tyson and Peter is too large to measure or describe, but I believe the big Nigerian’s limitations will be ably highlighted this weekend. And, ironically, the guy highlighting those shortcomings may yet emerge, belatedly, as the closest thing the division has to a savior. Remember, at 29 Klitschko is still younger than those bracketed as the “next generationâ€? of heavyweights – Harrison, Brock, Valuev, Guinn, Ibragimov et al. Klitschko KO-7

David Payne

(David Payne, a feature writer for The Sweet Science, hails from the UK, and was the winner of the CJ Award in July of 2005. To access his work, click here)

HANK KAPLAN SOUNDS OFF ON THE KLITSCHKO-PETER FIGHT

Thursday, September 22nd, 2005

Boxing Channel
Hank Kaplan

The legendary Hank Kaplan, the world’s foremost boxing historian, likes what he sees in this weekend’s Wladimir Klitschko–Sam Peter matchup. And he’s not afraid to talk about it. Can Wladimir keep his distance for long enough to outlast the young up-and-comer? Is Peter truly ready for the big time, or is he biting off more than he can chew? How far would an impressive win by the Nigerian go toward bringing new excitement and even potential legitimacy to the heavyweight division? Hank explores all this and more, with Boxing Channel’s Charles Jay.

To access the podcast, simply click on the icon below. And please, allow it a moment or two to download.

Podcast